When the days get shorter and leaves start to fall, there’s always a zoo somewhere in the Netherlands that gets taken over by dinosaurs. In previous years, I’ve covered dinosaur events at ZooParc Overloon and the former Dierenrijk, now Eindhoven Zoo. This year, to my mild surprise, it was the turn of our biggest and best zoo, the legendary Burgers’ Zoo in Arnhem. Of course, the general quality of Burgers’, combined with the pretty great animatronic dinosaurs on display at Kölner Zoo earlier this year, might have led me to have high expectations. Was this zoo, the yardstick by which I tend to measure all other zoos, going to offer another quality event?

Seeing footage of the actual dinosaurs in situ quickly led me to temper those expectations somewhat, because these were clearly the very same floppy, slack-jawed, barely-working, low-quality Chinasaurs seen at Overloon and Eindhoven. Still, it could be a good time, right? Time to get on the old trolley bus I’ve taken so many times. I grew up with this place.

This event ran until 5 November, the day before I publish this, which means this is a review of an event you can no longer visit. I’m sorry. I kinda didn’t want to write this, so I put it off. The truth is, I can’t tell you this event filled me with joy and wonder for the prehistoric world. In fact, it made me rather sad. I’m afraid dinosaurs are in danger of going extinct.

It’s well established that I like kitschy dinosaur events. There is a cheesy charm to these dinosaurs, to be sure. I didn’t hate some of them. But, after having seen what actual quality looks like, going back to this is a disappointment.

Sometimes, a kitsch expo like this can be saved by good signage. This does not seem to be the case today. There are informational signs that are a few steps behind where modern science stands, and the artwork tends to be mostly stock images.

What is far more calamitous, is that the bigger and clearly “original” signs were absolutely infested with horrible AI dinosaurs. This issue plagued the zoo in Cologne as well.

The result is a poorly constructed event that basically fails on all accounts. The animatronics offer little to be impressed by, the educational content is minimal and the usage of Generative AI is a blight upon the whole event. Even the placement of the dinosaurs throughout the park feels haphazard.

And what made me sadder was thinking “I’m sure nobody cares but me”.

Who cares if the dinosaurs are cheap, clichéd and inaccurate? Who cares if the images are AI? The families will still show up and gawk at dinosaurs anyway, right? It gets more people through the door so the animals can be fed, right? The absolute minimum has been done. The whole thing breathes a kind of mercenary cynicism. It felt a little gross.

It’s the principle of the thing. A modern zoo should be a champion of the protection of nature, and Burgers’ Zoo certainly is a modern zoo. Their famous “ecodisplay” format emphasizes a holistic view on nature, showing full ecosystems rather than just animal species divorced from their natural context. They provide some of the best animal husbandry possible by current standards. Their foundation supports all kinds of projects preserving important ecosystems in the wild. They contribute to biology, environmental science and the education of young conservationists.

I’m sure a handful of AI images by themselves won’t single-handedly destroy the mangrove forests of Belize, but it’s no secret that Generative AI has a massive environmental cost even as we’re facing a climate crisis, the end boss of all crises. The tech boys have given us a shiny new toy that destroys art, destroys thinking and destroys the environment for the sake of some grotesque plagiarized images but hey, at least we won’t have to pay an artist. A penny saved is a penny earned! For a zoo to participate in this destructive decadence is simply inexcusable.

And this is before we even consider the aesthetics of the whole thing, which, let’s be real, is pretty damn important too.

So great is my indignation that I actually sent an angry email to Burgers’ Zoo. If you agree with me, please do the same. The email address is info@burgerszoo.nl . Tell me I’m not the only one who cares.

Dinosaurs, in the form of kitschy parks, expositions and family events, probably aren’t going extinct. But care is going extinct. If we are to save nature, not to mention ourselves, the first thing we need to save is the concept of care. Even care for something as seemingly unimportant as a kitschy family dinosaur event. Burgers’ Zoo remains a stunning park, but last week it was a graveyard of dinosaurs. We’re all going to have to do a whole lot better.






8 Comments
Marc Vincent
November 6, 2025 at 12:28 pmI can understand the cheap robots (even if they feel rather beneath a place like Burgers’), but the use of AI is pretty inexcusable.
jpersonj
November 18, 2025 at 11:56 amIt’s not even efficient! You have to pay for some freemium crud or sit around waiting for it and being bombarded by ads.
Grab some random kids dino book from a thrift store (or your own giftshop) and boom, you’ve got dinosaurs. If you’re taking the effort of printing a banner just take twenty seconds to get something worth printing.
Gemma Hazeborg
November 18, 2025 at 12:14 pmWell, there is always the problem of copyright law on images. Which, on AI, is still very much an unresolved issue. But you can’t just copy art from a random book, print it on a banner and hang it out to dry without some form of permission.
But still, just fork over some cash for stock pictures. They have it. Do the PAPO T. rex for all I care.
Thomas Diehl
November 6, 2025 at 3:17 pmFrom what I have seen of AI making dinosaurs, I don’t think these are AI. They are far too accurate – in that they all have at least a fleeting resemblance to the actual dinosaur they’re trying to be. AI, meanwhile, can’t tell a Stegosaurus from a Parasaurolophus. I think these are just 3d assets bought online and then put in some rendering software like Blender.
Gemma Hazeborg
November 6, 2025 at 3:40 pmI’m fairly sure. It’s the inconsistencies between models. One Stegosaurus has a turtle head, the other an ornithopod head. Also the shading is all wrong.
Marc Vincent
November 6, 2025 at 5:56 pmEverything but the Spinosaurus, which I recognise from a poster I had back in 2009, is definitely AI. Albeit at the better end of the scale. It has the plasticky JPish look.
Gemma Hazeborg
November 7, 2025 at 3:40 amYou say “better”. I say more deceptive. I can still tell the difference for the time being, mostly by the way my hairs stand on end, but it’ll get harder.
Kai Caspar
December 3, 2025 at 2:43 amThank you for this write-up.
I find it curious how zoos try to argue that such exhibitions remind visitors of the value of conservation and effectively educate people, furthering the zoo mission. I’m not at all convinced of that and would love to somehow do a proper study of what kind of information zoos choose to convey with this and what the visitors actually take from it.
For instance, none of those exhibitions I’ve seen so far has even attempted to highlight birds (which tend to be overlooked by visitors anyway) as dinosaurs and discuss the evolution of their bauplan in that context. A wasted opportunity.